balmofgilead (
balmofgilead) wrote2006-06-26 12:50 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(no subject)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-syndicated.gif)
The first piece is about a New Yorker article discussing the absolute nature of South Dakota's abortion ban and the dilemma it creates: A person who professes to be pro-life but insists on a rape-and-incest exception (which covers most pro-life politicians in this country, including President Bush) is saying one of two things: either it is justifiable to kill children in some circumstances, or what grows in a woman's uterus is a child if the woman had sex voluntarily but not if she was forced into it.
The second is a response to someone who questioned the logic in loving one's own, already-born child while advocating abortion rights (er, "vehement declarations that other children are disposable" according to the commenter).
Very well done, both.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)